Creating Landscape-Scale Site Index Maps for the Southeastern US Is Possible with Airborne LiDAR and Landsat Imagery

Thumbnail Image

Files

forests-10-00234.pdf (2.51 MB)

Links to Files

https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/10/3/234

Permanent Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/f10030234
 http://hdl.handle.net/11603/13082

Collections

UMBC Geography and Environmental Systems Department
UMBC Faculty Collection

Author/Creator

Author/Creator ORCID

Date

2019-03-06

Type of Work

journal articles
Text

Department

Program

Citation of Original Publication

Gopalakrishnan, R.; Kauffman, J.S.; Fagan, M.E.; Coulston, J.W.; Thomas, V.A.; Wynne, R.H.; Fox, T.R.; Quirino, V.F. Creating Landscape-Scale Site Index Maps for the Southeastern US Is Possible with Airborne LiDAR and Landsat Imagery. Forests 2019, 10, 234

Rights

This item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.
Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)

Subjects

forestry
forest site productivity
site index
landsat
airborne laser scanning
forest productivity mapping
Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA)

Abstract

Sustainable forest management is hugely dependent on high-quality estimates of forest site productivity, but it is challenging to generate productivity maps over large areas. We present a method for generating site index (a measure of such forest productivity) maps for plantation loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) forests over large areas in the southeastern United States by combining airborne laser scanning (ALS) data from disparate acquisitions and Landsat-based estimates of forest age. For predicting canopy heights, a linear regression model was developed using ALS data and field measurements from the Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program of the US Forest Service (n = 211 plots). The model was strong (R² = 0.84, RMSE = 1.85 m), and applicable over a large area (~208,000 sq. km). To estimate the site index, we combined the ALS estimated heights with Landsat-derived maps of stand age and planted pine area. The estimated bias was low (􀀀0.28 m) and the RMSE (3.8 m, relative RMSE: 19.7%, base age 25 years) was consistent with other similar approaches. Due to Landsat-related constraints, our methodology is valid only for relatively young pine plantations established after 1984. We generated 30 m resolution site index maps over a large area (~832 sq. km). The site index distribution had a median value of 19.4 m, the 5th percentile value of 13.0 m and the 95th percentile value of 23.3 m. Further, using a watershed level analysis, we ranked these regions by their estimated productivity. These results demonstrate the potential and value of remote sensing based large-area site index maps.