The fish eye view: are cichlids conspicuous

Thumbnail Image

Files

2243.full.pdf (2.3 MB)
037671FigS1.pdf (21.8 KB)
037671FigS3.pdf (71.7 KB)
037671FigS4.pdf (78 KB)
037671FigS5.pdf (397.93 KB)

Links to Files

http://jeb.biologists.org/content/213/13/2243

Permanent Link

https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.037671
 http://hdl.handle.net/11603/13401

Collections

UMBC Biological Sciences Department
UMBC Faculty Collection

Author/Creator

Author/Creator ORCID

Date

2010-06-11

Type of Work

journal articles
Text

Department

Program

Citation of Original Publication

Brian E. Dalton, Thomas W. Cronin, N. Justin Marshall, Karen L. Carleton, The fish eye view: are cichlids conspicuous? , Journal of Experimental Biology 2010, 213: 2243-2255; doi: 10.1242/jeb.037671

Rights

This item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.
non-commercial use only

Subjects

sexual selection
speciation
colour
signal
vision
cichlid

Abstract

The extent of animal colouration is determined by an interplay between natural and sexual selection. Both forces probably shape colouration in the speciose, rock-dwelling cichlids of Lake Malawi. Sexual selection is thought to drive male colouration, overcoming natural selection to create conspicuous colour patterns via female mate choice and male–male competition. However, natural selection should make female cichlids cryptic because they mouthbrood their young. We hypothesize that as a result of both sexual and natural selection, males will have colours that are more conspicuous than female colours. Cichlid spectral sensitivity, especially in the ultraviolet, probably influences how colours appear to them. Here we use simple models of the trichromatic colour space of cichlid visual systems to compare the conspicuousness of male and female nuptial colours of nine species. Conspicuousness of colours was evaluated as their Euclidian distance in colour space from environmental backgrounds and from other colours on the same fish. We find in six of the nine species that breeding males have colours that are statistically more conspicuous than female colours. These colours contrast strongly with each other or with the backgrounds, and they fall within a range of spectra best transmitted in the habitat. Female colour distances were sometimes smaller, suggesting that females of some species are more cryptic than males. Therefore, selection can differentially act to generate male colours that are more conspicuous than those in females. However, in two species, females had colours that were more conspicuous than male colours, suggesting that other selective forces and possibly sexual conflicts are acting in this system.