Defining Disciplinary Literacy Practices and Evaluating the Professional Identity of Medical Laboratory Science

Thumbnail Image

Files

Defining_Disciplinary_Literacy.pdf (1.87 MB)

Links to Files

http://proxy-su.researchport.umd.edu/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.proxy-su.researchport.umd.edu/docview/2312810028?accountid=28711

Permanent Link

http://hdl.handle.net/11603/16911

Collections

SU Dissertations

Author/Creator

Author/Creator ORCID

Date

2019-08

Type of Work

dissertations
Text

Department

Doctoral Studies in Literacy

Program

Doctor of Education (Ed.D.) Contemporary Curriculum Theory and Instruction: Literacy

Citation of Original Publication

Rights

Subjects

Delphi Method
Disciplinary literacy
Medical Laboratory Science
Professional identity

Abstract

Disciplinary literacy has been a growing area of interest in educational research (McConachie & Petrosky, 2010; Moje, 2007) in the last two decades, however much of the research has remained theoretical. While some studies have examined specific areas of disciplinary literacy, such as reading or writing, and compared that particular practice among different disciplines (Carter, 2007; C. Shanahan, Shanahan, & Misischia, 2011) very few studies have examined the entirety of the literacy of a discipline (Brill, Dohun, & Branch, 2007; Frick, 1990). This research study sought to define and understand the disciplinary literacy practices of medical laboratory science (MLS), an analytical and technical area of healthcare where professionals test patient samples in order to provide accurate data for physicians who are then able to diagnose the patient and provide effective treatment. In addition, this study investigated the professional identity of MLS, which has a long history of being indistinct and unorganized (Evans, 1968; Grant, 2007; Kotlarz, 1998a, 2000), and considered how the disciplinary literacy practices of the profession may contribute to a stronger professional identity.