Assessing reduced-dynamic parametrizations for GRAIL orbit determination and the recovery of independent lunar gravity field solutions

Thumbnail Image

Files

essoar.10504583.1.pdf (1.66 MB)

Links to Files

https://www.essoar.org/doi/abs/10.1002/essoar.10504583.1

Permanent Link

https://doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10504583.1
 http://hdl.handle.net/11603/20141

Collections

UMBC Center for Space Sciences and Technology (CSST) / Center for Research and Exploration in Space Sciences & Technology II (CRSST II)
UMBC Faculty Collection
UMBC Physics Department

Author/Creator

Author/Creator ORCID

Date

2020-11-02

Type of Work

journal articles preprints
Text

Department

Program

Citation of Original Publication

Bertone Stefano and Arnold Daniel and Girardin Valère and Lasser Martin and Meyer Ulrich and Jäggi Adrian, Assessing reduced-dynamic parametrizations for GRAIL orbit determination and the recovery of independent lunar gravity field solutions, Earth and Space Science Open Archive, pp 28 (2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10504583.1

Rights

This item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International

Subjects

Abstract

Orbit determination of probes orbiting Solar System bodies is currently the main source of our knowledge about their internal structure, inferred from the estimate of their gravity field and rotational state. Non-gravitational forces acting on the spacecraft need to be accurately included in the dynamical modeling (either explicitly or in the form of empirical parameters) to not degrade the solution and its geophysical interpretation. In this work, we present our recovery of NASA GRAIL orbits and our lunar gravity field solutions up to degree and order 350. We propose a systematic approach to select an optimal parametrization with empirical accelerations and pseudo-stochastic pulses, by checking their impact against orbit overlaps or, in the case of GRAIL, the very precise inter-satellite link. We discuss how parametrization choices may differ depending on whether the goal is limited to orbit reconstruction or if it also includes the solution of gravity field coefficients. We validate our setup for planetary geodesy by iterating extended lunar gravity field solutions from pre-GRAIL gravity fields, and we discuss the impact of empirical parametrization on the interpretation of gravity solutions and of their error bars.