American national identity and wartime security policy: a multiple traditions analysis

Thumbnail Image

Files

TSP2017Calderon_Redacted.pdf (872.46 KB)

Links to Files

https://cdm17252.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/etd/id/57396

Permanent Link

http://hdl.handle.net/11603/4746

Collections

Towson University Graduate Theses and Dissertations

Author/Creator

Author/Creator ORCID

Date

2017-08-31

Type of Work

theses
Text
application/pdf

Department

Program

Towson University. Social Sciences Program

Citation of Original Publication

Rights

Subjects

Abstract

Using a case study approach, this paper examines American national identity through the impacts that discriminatory wartime domestic security policies have on perceived enemy populations. The central argument holds that although Americans claim a principled commitment to the Creed, they deviate from their principles when national security threats arise, indicating that Americans hold beliefs about themselves that are conceptually prior to the Creed. Otherization of perceived enemies during wartime represents a deviation from the Creed and demonstrates that multiple traditions frame American national identity. Otherization becomes a tool that Americans use to reconcile their principles with their contradictory and inegalitarian practices, but the Creed exists to keep their deviations temporary.