Browsing UMBC Political Science by Issue Date
Now showing items 1-20 of 181
-
Cycle avoiding trajectories, strategic agendas, and the duality of memory and foresight: An informal exposition
(Public Choice, 1990)This paper considers the notion of cycle avoiding trajectories in majority voting tournaments and shows that they underlie and guide several apparently disparate voting processes. The set of alternatives that are maximal ... -
Deconstructing the Affirmative Action Categories
(SAGE, 1998-04-01)Affirmative action preferences have traditionally benefited four racial and ethnic group categories: African Americans, Hispanics, Asian Americans, and Native Americans. These categories may be overinclusive, masking ... -
Limits on agenda control in spatial voting games
(Elsevier, 2002-04-01)A theorem due to McKelvey implies that, if a single agent controls the agenda of a spatial voting game, he can almost always design an agenda that yields whatever voting outcome he wishes. Here we make use of a geometrical ... -
Narrow Tailoring the Federal Transportation DBE Program
(The Federalist Society, 2006-03-04)Under the Supreme Court’s strict scrutiny test, governments must have both a compelling interest to employ a racial classification in a program and that use of race must be narrowly tailored. After Adarand Constructors, ... -
The butterfly effect under STV
(Elsevier, 2006-12-06)This note presents an example of the sometimes chaotic character of the single transferable vote (STV) that is both somewhat simpler, and even more striking, than previous examples, and it offers several comments about the ... -
Can the Federal Transportation DBE Program Be Narrowly Tailored to Remedy Discrimination?
(The Federalist Society, 2007-10-01)The federal transportation Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) program is a relic from another era that no longer serves a civil rights purpose. DBE is the progeny of the 10% minority set-aside provision in the 1977 ... -
A New Era in Federal Preferential Contracting? Rothe Development Corporation v. United States Department of Defense and Department of the Air Force
(The Federalist Society, 2009-02-16)On Election Day, while the country’s attention was otherwise engaged, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously stuck down the racial preferences in Section 1207 of the National Defense Authorization Act (1987), the ... -
Agenda trees and sincere voting: a response to Schwartz
(Springer Nature, 2009-11-17)Schwartz (Public Choice 136:353–377, 2008) has identified a controversy within the voting theory literature pertaining to the representation of agenda structures and the consequent definition of sincere voting. This note ... -
Institutional Review Board Rules: Should One Size Fit All Disciplines?
(CGScholar, 2010)Almost every major United States university requires faculty members and students who wish to do research on “human subjects” to submit proposals to Institutional Review Boards (IRBs). These university Boards/committees, ... -
Comparing the Establishment of Judicial Review in Canada and the United States
(Elsevier, 2010-06-27) -
AGENDAS AND SINCERITY: A SECOND RESPONSE TO SCHWARTZ
(Springer Nature, 2010-08-27)An Ordeshook-Schwartz agenda tree requires a voting theorist to assign a unique “ostensive alternative” to each node, but under some non-pairwise agendas there is no evident principle by which to do this. Therefore ... -
The uncovered set and indifference in spatial models: A fuzzy set approach
(Elsevier, 2010-11-09)The uncovered set was developed in order to predict outcomes when spatial models result in an empty core. In contrast to conventional approaches, fuzzy spatial models induce a substantial degree of individual and collective ... -
Revise or Start Anew? Pondering the Google Books Rejection
(2011-06-22) -
Pruning the Overgrowth of Government Contracting Preferences
(The Federalist Society, 2011-09)The policy of creating preferences for businesses owned at least fifty-one percent by members of “minority” groups is now more than three decades old. In 1977, Congressman Parren Mitchell, the head of the Congressional ... -
Banzhaf voting power, random elections, and the Electoral College winner’s advantage
(Elsevier, 2011-09-05)In a recent article, Riggs et al. (2009) aim to measure the ‘Electoral College winner's advantage’—in particular, the extent to which the winner’s electoral vote margin of victory is magnified as a result of (i) the ‘two ... -
Why the Electoral College is good for political science (and public choice)
(Springer Nature, 2011-10-04)While the Electoral College may not be good for the political system, it is very good for political science (and public choice). This essay documents many of the ways in which this assertion is true. -
Election Inversions by the U.S. Electoral College
(Springer, 2011-10-28)An election inversion occurs when the candidate (or party) that wins the most votes from an electorate fails to win the most electoral votes (or parliamentary seats) and therefore loses the election. Public commentary ... -
Pyrrhic Victories: How the Secularization Doctrine Undermines the Sanctity of Religion
(Oxford University Press, 2011-11-15)The Supreme Court has sanctioned displays of Christian crèches,1 Jewish menorahs,2 and the Judeo-Christian Ten Commandments.3 Lower courts have rejected Establishment Clause claims against the display of the Latin cross ...