Evaluation of passive sampling polymers and nonequilibrium adjustment methods in a multiyear surveillance of sediment porewater PCBs
Loading...
Author/Creator
Author/Creator ORCID
Date
2018-07-05
Type of Work
Department
Program
Citation of Original Publication
James P. Sanders, Natasha A. Andrade, Charles A. Menzie, C. Bennett Amos, Cynthia C. Gilmour, Elizabeth A. Henry, Steven S. Brown and Upal Ghosh, Persistent reductions in the bioavailability of PCBs at a tidally inundated Phragmites australis marsh amended with activated carbon, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Volume: 37, NO. 9, (2496-2505), (2018), https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.4223
Rights
This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: James P. Sanders, Natasha A. Andrade, Charles A. Menzie, C. Bennett Amos, Cynthia C. Gilmour, Elizabeth A. Henry, Steven S. Brown and Upal Ghosh, Persistent reductions in the bioavailability of PCBs at a tidally inundated Phragmites australis marsh amended with activated carbon, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Volume: 37, NO. 9, (2496-2505), (2018), https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.4223, which has been published in final form athttps://doi.org/10.1002/etc.4223. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.
Abstract
Polymeric passive sampling devices are increasingly used to measure low‐level, freely dissolved concentrations of hydrophobic organic contaminants in environmental waters. A range of polymers have been used for this purpose, and several different methods of accounting for nonequilibrium using performance reference compounds (PRCs) have been proposed. The present study explores the practical impacts of these decisions in an applied context using results from a multiyear passive sampling surveillance of polychlorinated biphenyl concentrations in sediment porewater at a contaminated marsh amended with activated carbon (AC) sorbent materials. In a series of 5 sampling events spanning almost 2 yr, we deployed polyoxymethylene and polyethylene samplers and calculated porewater concentrations with 5 different PRC adjustment methods. The results provide a basis for evaluating amendment performance by showing reductions of 34 to 97% in amended sediment porewater concentrations. They also provide a quantitative underpinning for discussions of the differences between sampling polymers, selection of PRCs, generation of high‐resolution vertical profiles of porewater concentrations, and a comparison of PRC adjustment methods. For unamended sediment, older methods based on first‐order kinetics agreed well with a recently developed method based on diffusion into and out of sediment beds. However, the sediment diffusion method did not work well for the sediments amended with AC.