Patients' beliefs about morphine and its effectiveness for pain control
Loading...
Links to Files
Permanent Link
Collections
Author/Creator
Author/Creator ORCID
Date
1996
Department
Nursing
Program
Citation of Original Publication
Rights
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to examine the beliefs of
patients regarding the use of morphine to control cancer
pain. In addition, the study explored fears that concerned
subjects about morphine use. A twenty-item questionnaire
originally developed by Ward (1993) was adapted for use with
patients taking oral morphine. The questionnaire was given
to patients currently receiving radiation or chemotherapy
treatments at local cancer centers and hospices in a mid-Atlantic
region. Responses from a total of sixty-four subjects were
obtained including thirty subjects who used morphine, and
thirty-four who did not use it. Questionnaires were
distributed by staff at the various cancer centers. In order
to be included in the study, subjects had to have a
diagnosis of cancer. The study posed three research questions. The first
question addressed whether morphine users and non-users had
different general beliefs regarding morphine. Additional
questions asked whether differences existed between morphine
users and non-users on the addictive properties of morphine
and whether there were any perceived differences in side
effects of morphine between the two groups. Lastly, a
preliminary validity assessment was done using an exploratory factor analysis to identify if factors in the
current questionnaire reflected those found by Ward (1993).
Using Mann-Whitney analysis, the study found
significant differences between the two groups on eight
items of the questionnaire. These items pertained to the
ability of MS to control pain (three items), the addictive
nature of morphine, the fatalism of its use, the possibility
of morphine causing one to say embarrassing things, the side
effect of nausea, and the avoidance of health care workers
to talk about pain. Using Chi-square analysis, no
significant differences were found for the two groups
regarding morphine and its addictive properties or with
perceived differences in side effects of the drug. Lastly,
the exploratory factor analysis did not find that items from
the current study grouped together into the subscales found
in Ward's (1993) original study.
Replication of the study was recommended in order to
increase the validity of factor structure of the tool.
Secondly, future research is needed on morphine use with a
larger number of subjects.