Risk and Reform: Explaining Support for Constitutional Convention Referendums
Loading...
Author/Creator
Author/Creator ORCID
Date
2020-05-14
Type of Work
Department
Program
Citation of Original Publication
Blake, William D., and Ian G. Anson. “Risk and Reform: Explaining Support for Constitutional Convention Referendums.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly, (May 2020). doi:10.1177/1532440020919680.
Rights
This item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.
William D. Blake and Ian G. Anson, Risk and Reform: Explaining Support for Constitutional Convention Referendums, State Politics & Policy Quarterly . Copyright © 2020 State Politics and Policy Organized Section of the American Political Science Association. DOI:10.1177/1532440020919680.
William D. Blake and Ian G. Anson, Risk and Reform: Explaining Support for Constitutional Convention Referendums, State Politics & Policy Quarterly . Copyright © 2020 State Politics and Policy Organized Section of the American Political Science Association. DOI:10.1177/1532440020919680.
Subjects
Abstract
Scholars of comparative constitution-making and direct democracy agree that economic conditions affect public support for constitutional reform but disagree as to how. Prospect theory suggests both approaches may be correct, depending on the political and economic context in which voters operate. Fourteen states periodically ask their citizens whether to call a state constitutional convention, making this the oldest form of direct democracy in the United States. We test our theory in pre-election polls in two of these states and a survey experiment. According to the results, negative perceptions of economic and government performance increase support for conventions when voters view them as opportunities to correct problems. On the other hand, if a convention represents a chance to improve on an acceptable status quo, voters with positive performance evaluations become more supportive. Our findings contribute to the heuristics literature and inform normative debates over direct democracy and popular constitutionalism.