An Unequal Burden: Poor Patient-Provider Communication and Sickle Cell Disease
Loading...
Author/Creator ORCID
Date
2014-05-23
Type of Work
Department
Program
Citation of Original Publication
Carlton Haywood Jr et al., An unequal burden: Poor patient–provider communication and sickle cell disease, Patient Education and Counseling Volume 96, Issue 2, August 2014, Pages 159-164 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.013
Rights
This item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Subjects
Abstract
Objective
To assess disparities in the quality of healthcare provider communication experienced by African-American adults with and without sickle cell disease (SCD) in the U.S.
Methods
Poor provider communication was assessed by the Provider Communication subscale of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Plans and Systems survey. The SCD sample was obtained from participants in a multicenter observational study of healthcare experiences. The national African-American sample data was obtained from published national estimates.
Results
The SCD sample was more likely than the national sample to report poor communication in 3 out of 4 communication domains: listening (22.3% vs. 11.5%, p < 0.0001); showing respect (26.1% vs. 9.5%, p < 0.0001); and spending enough time (38.3% vs. 16.2%, p < 0.0001). Differences were consistent in young, but not old, patients and showed some variation by self-reported health status and education.
Conclusions
The communication difficulties experienced by persons with SCD do not appear reducible to their predominantly African-American race, but may result from more disease-specific factors.
Practice implications
Healthcare providers should take particular care in recognizing and demonstrating recommended communication skills with SCD patients as these patients may be particularly vulnerable to, and cognizant of, poor quality interactions.