Conversion of hydroperoxides to carbonyls in field and laboratory instrumentation: Observational bias in diagnosing pristine versus anthropogenically controlled atmospheric chemistry

Author/Creator ORCID

Date

2014-11-17

Department

Program

Citation of Original Publication

Rivera-Rios, J. C., et al. (2014), Conversionof hydroperoxides to carbonyls in fieldand laboratory instrumentation:Observational bias in diagnosing pristineversus anthropogenically controlledatmospheric chemistry, Geophys. Res.Lett., 41,8645–8651, doi:10.1002/2014GL061919

Rights

This item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.
Public Domain Mark 1.0
This work was written as part of one of the author's official duties as an Employee of the United States Government and is therefore a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 105, no copyright protection is available for such works under U.S. Law.

Subjects

Abstract

Atmospheric volatile organic compound (VOC) oxidation mechanisms under pristine (rural/remote) and urban (anthropogenically‐influenced) conditions follow distinct pathways due to large differences in nitrogen oxide (NOx) concentrations. These two pathways lead to products that have different chemical and physical properties and reactivity. Under pristine conditions, isoprene hydroxy hydroperoxides (ISOPOOHs) are the dominant first‐generation isoprene oxidation products. Utilizing authentic ISOPOOH standards, we demonstrate that two of the most commonly used methods of measuring VOC oxidation products (i.e., gas chromatography and proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry) observe these hydroperoxides as their equivalent high‐NO isoprene oxidation products – methyl vinyl ketone (MVK) and methacrolein (MACR). This interference has led to an observational bias affecting our understanding of global atmospheric processes. Considering these artifacts will help close the gap on discrepancies regarding the identity and fate of reactive organic carbon, revise our understanding of surface‐atmosphere exchange of reactive carbon and SOA formation, and improve our understanding of atmospheric oxidative capacity.