Coping Responses Among Hospice Family Caregivers: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis
No Thumbnail Available
Author/Creator
Author/Creator ORCID
Date
2015-07-22
Type of Work
Department
Program
Citation of Original Publication
Karla T. Washington and Christopher R. Rakes, Coping Responses Among Hospice Family Caregivers: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis, BRIEF REPORT| VOLUME 50, ISSUE 6, P867-873 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.07.002
Rights
This item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.
Abstract
Context
Hospice family caregivers must often cope with significant stressors. Research into the ways caregivers attempt to cope with these stressors has been challenged by pronounced difficulties conceptualizing, measuring, and categorizing caregiver coping.
Objectives
The purpose of this study was to begin addressing these challenges by determining the structure of coping among hospice family caregivers.
Methods
Hospice family caregivers (n = 223) residing in the midsouthern U.S. completed the Ways of Coping Questionnaire as part of a cross-sectional survey. To examine the validity of various coping response factor structures, researchers conducted multiple confirmatory factor analyses.
Results
Although individual coping behaviors were able to be sorted into broader “ways of coping” (i.e., first-order factors), data did not support the further grouping of ways of coping into more general “families of coping” (i.e., second-order factors). Folkman and Lazarus's proposed structure of coping, which comprises eight first-order factors or subscales, better fit the data than the tested alternatives.
Conclusion
Despite its broad appeal, grouping ways of coping responses into families of coping based on the presupposed nature of the responses (e.g., positive or negative) lacked empirical support for this sample of hospice family caregivers, which suggests that relying on families of coping may oversimplify complex responses from caregivers. Rather than trying to characterize coping responses into broader families, hospice support for caregiver coping strategies may be more effective when based on individualized assessments of each caregiver's ways of coping and the consequences of those coping responses on their quality of life.