Deficit Attention Disorder: Partisan-Motivated Reasoning About Government Overspending
No Thumbnail Available
Author/Creator
Author/Creator ORCID
Date
2020-11-30
Type of Work
Department
Program
Citation of Original Publication
Kane, John V.; Anson, Ian G.; Deficit Attention Disorder: Partisan-Motivated Reasoning About Government Overspending; Public Opinion and Voting Behavior (2020); https://preprints.apsanet.org/engage/apsa/article-details/5fc0947cf9fdb80017e21442
Rights
This item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.
Subjects
Abstract
Government overspending remains a prominent concern in American politics. Yet, despite the burgeoning literature on partisan-motivated reasoning (PMR), we know little about the extent to which such concern arises from partisan considerations. We advance extant literature by uncovering a novel means by which citizens reason about deficits in a partisan-motivated fashion—i.e., by shifting the importance of the issue. Leveraging pre-registered experimental and observational studies, we find that partisans systematically adjust the importance of government overspending based upon which party occupies the presidency. Further, this proclivity to engage in PMR does not require explicit cues from elites, is symmetrical across parties, and appears to function both to protect one’s own party and rebuke the opposing party. Lastly, in a large-scale text analysis of transcripts from televised partisan media, we again find strong evidence of PMR on the issue of government overspending, though primarily in conservative media.