Crosswalking ZIP Codes to Census Geographies: Geoprocessing the U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development’s ZIP Code Crosswalk Files

Author/Creator ORCID

Date

2020

Department

Program

Citation of Original Publication

Din, Alexander; Wilson, Ron; Crosswalking ZIP Codes to Census Geographies: Geoprocessing the U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development’s ZIP Code Crosswalk Files; A Journal of Policy Development and Research, Volume 22, Number 1, 2020; https://www.huduser.gov/portal/periodicals/cityscpe/vol22num1/article12.html

Rights

This item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.
Public Domain Mark 1.0
This is a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 105, no copyright protection is available for such works under U.S. Law.

Subjects

Abstract

Although ZIP Codes are a commonly used geographic unit for mapping and spatial analysis, they frequently distort data (Beyer, Schultz, and Rushton, 2007; Cudnick et al., 2012; Dai, 2010; Grubesic and Matisziw, 2006; Hipp, 2007; Krieger et al., 2002; Montalvo and Reynal-Querol, 2017; Wilson, 2015). ZIP Codes are designed for efficient mail delivery, not for geographic analysis. The large area that ZIP Codes cover make them susceptible to data aggregation problems that corrupt local geographic patterns. Due to the irregular—and often contorted—shapes of ZIP Codes, smaller geographic boundaries are ignored when overlain with smaller geographies, to which population counts are disproportionally distributed between the multiple areas that are cross-cut. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) provides several crosswalk files to estimate incident counts at different geographic scales from data at the ZIP-Code level.