Linking salience signaling with early adversity and affective distress in individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis: results from an event-related fMRI study

Date

2022-06-17

Department

Program

Citation of Original Publication

Zachary B Millman, PhD, Jason Schiffman, PhD, James M Gold, PhD, Lee Ann Akouri-Shan, MA, Caroline Demro, PhD, John Fitzgerald, MA, Pamela Rakhshan Rouhakhtar, PhD, Mallory Klaunig, PhD, Laura M Rowland, PhD, James A Waltz, PhD, Linking salience signaling with early adversity and affective distress in individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis: results from an event-related fMRI study, Schizophrenia Bulletin Open, 2022;, sgac039, https://doi.org/10.1093/schizbullopen/sgac039

Rights

This item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

Subjects

Abstract

Evidence suggests dysregulation of the salience network in individuals with psychosis, but few studies have examined the intersection of stress exposure and affective distress with prediction error (PE) signals among youth at clinical high-risk (CHR). Here, 26 individuals at CHR and 19 healthy volunteers (HVs) completed a monetary incentive delay task in conjunction with fMRI. We compared these groups on the amplitudes of neural responses to surprising outcomes—PEs without respect to their valence—across the whole brain and in two regions of interest, the anterior insula and amygdala. We then examined relations of these signals to the severity of depression, anxiety, and trauma histories in the CHR group. Relative to HV, youth at CHR presented with aberrant PE-evoked activation of the temporoparietal junction and weaker deactivation of the precentral gyrus, posterior insula, and associative striatum. No between-group differences were observed in the amygdala or anterior insula. Among youth at CHR, greater trauma histories were correlated with stronger PE-evoked amygdala activation. No associations were found between affective symptoms and the neural responses to PE. Our results suggest that unvalenced PE signals may provide unique information about the neurobiology of CHR syndromes and that early adversity exposure may contribute to neurobiological heterogeneity in this group. Longitudinal studies of young people with a range of risk syndromes are needed to further disentangle the contributions of distinct aspects of salience signaling to the development of psychopathology.