Finding a Balance: The Rehabilitation of Historic Buildings for Low-Income Housing
MetadataShow full item record
Type of Work190 p.
ProgramMA in Historic Preservation
RightsTo view a complete copy of this thesis please contact Goucher College Special Collections & Archives at firstname.lastname@example.org or (410) 337-6075.
SubjectsHistoric buildings -- Conservation and restoration -- United States -- Finance
Rehabilitation investment tax credit
Low-income housing -- Finance -- Law and legislation -- United States
Rehabilitation investment tax credit -- Law and legislation -- United States
Historic buildings -- Conservation and restoration -- Taxation -- United States
Historic buildings -- Taxation -- Law and legislation -- United States
Tax incentives -- Law and legislation -- United States
Historic preservation -- Theses
Historic buildings are being converted into low-income housing all over the United States. These projects serve two long-established public policy objectives at once since they provide needed low-income housing while at the same time they preserve historic buildings which contribute to a community’s sense of its past. Most projects which convert historic buildings into low-income housing take advantage of two Federal incentives: the Historic Rehabilitation Tax Credit (HRTC) and the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC). In order to be eligible for the HRTC, the rehabilitation work must meet the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation (the Standards). This thesis research explores the question: Which specific problems involving the cost of satisfying the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation most often arise in projects that use both the Historic Rehabilitation Tax Credits and the Low-income Housing Tax Credits and how have they been solved? This research finds that the HRTC in combination with the LIHTC can provide the majority of the financial equity needed to fund a project. It also finds that historic rehabilitation can be accomplished within the budgetary restraints of the LIHTC process. The HRTC and the LIHTC and their history are described and the advantages and disadvantage of combining them are discussed. The Standards and their history and application are also discussed. Two case studies which combine the two tax credits are analyzed. Conclusions are reached based on the application of the Standards in the two case studies and recommendations for further study are made. This research finds that this process works. Historic buildings, provided that they can physically accommodate housing, can be converted to low-income housing while preserving most the building’s architectural integrity and historic significance. It finds that successfully combing the HRTC and the LIHTC is extremely complex process and that combining these programs requires a dedicated and experienced development team. This study also shows that the policy goals of historic preservation and an increased supply of low income housing could be better served if the HRTC and the LIHTC were redesigned to improve their compatibility.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
The Automatic Gas Machine Era, 1853-1923: Analysis of Improvements in Patented Illuminating Devices and Processes Grisi, Mark P. (2003)This thesis analyses the progression of automatic gasoline lighting systems, [air-gas machines], from the 1840's through the 1920's. The automatic gasoline lighting systems are evaluated from the perspective of the four ...
The Dyes Inlet Indian Communities: An Analysis of the Historic Significance of an Off-Reservation Settlement Forsman, Leonard A. (2004)This analysis of systems to determine significance of tangible and intangible resources of American heritage shows a history of negative bias toward places of historic significance to American Indians. The hypothesis asks ...
Bergman, Knickole (2017-10-11)Agriculture practices changed drastically proceeding World War II coinciding with the eruption in birth rate that created the generation known as the “baby boomers”. According to Richard Fry, in 1946, 3.4 million babies ...