The Effect of Using Electronic Books During Sustained Silent Reading on the Reading Achievement and Motivation of First Grade Students

Thumbnail Image

Files

SnyderAmanda_paper.pdf (352.89 KB)

Links to Files

Permanent Link

http://hdl.handle.net/11603/3076

Collections

Goucher College Master of Education

Author/Creator

Author/Creator ORCID

Date

2016-07

Type of Work

action research papers
Text

Department

Program

Masters of Education

Citation of Original Publication

Rights

Collection may be protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. To obtain information or permission to publish or reproduce, please contact the Goucher Special Collections & Archives at 410-337-6347 or email archives@goucher.edu.
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States

Subjects

Sustained Silent Reading
SSR
digital text
E-books
digital vs. print
electronic vs. print
Motivation to Read Profile
Motivation to Read Profile-Revised
reading achievement
MRP
MRP-R
Fountas and Pinnell
Education -- Research papers (Graduate).
Motivation in education -- Silent reading.
First grade (Education) -- Silent reading.
Electronic books -- Silent reading -- First grade (Education)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the impact on reading achievement and motivation of using digital texts versus traditional, printed texts with first grade students during Sustained Silent Reading (SSR). Fifty-four first grade students from two existing classes at a suburban elementary school in the mid-Atlantic region participated in the study. All students were reading on an average or above average reading level. The measurement tool used to evaluate reading achievement was the Fountas and Pinnell Benchmark Assessment and the tool used to evaluate motivation was the Motivation to Read Profile-Revised (MRP-R). This study utilized a pre-test/post-test quasi-experimental design, in which students’ reading achievement and motivation scores from December 2015 were compared to their scores from March 2015, following three months of intervention. The treatment and control groups did not differ significantly on their pre-test motivation and achievement. During the treatment period, students in the control group were only permitted to read traditional, printed texts during their daily 30 minutes of SSR, while students in the experimental group were only permitted to read digital texts. While both groups showed positive increases in reading achievement and motivation, results indicated the gains in reading levels were not statistically significant for the students who read digital texts compared to those who did not (t=0.16, p=0.88) and results indicated the gains in reading motivation were not statistically significant, as well (t=-0.78, p=0.44). Therefore, the null hypotheses were not rejected. With the continued drive to integrate technology into the classroom, further research is necessary to determine the impact on achievement and motivation of using digital texts with school-age students in all grades and with varying degrees of reading proficiency.