Goolsby, Craig Strauss-Riggs, KandraRozenfeld, MichaelCharlton, Nathan Goralnick, Eric Peleg, Kobi Levy, MatthewDavis, Tim Hurst, Nicole 2023-07-312023-07-312019-01-16Goolsby, Craig, Kandra Strauss-Riggs, Michael Rozenfeld, Nathan Charlton, Eric Goralnick, Kobi Peleg, Matthew J. Levy, Tim Davis, and Nicole Hurst. “Equipping Public Spaces to Facilitate Rapid Point-of-Injury Hemorrhage Control After Mass Casualty.” American Journal of Public Health 109, no. 2 (February 2019): 236–41. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304773.https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304773http://hdl.handle.net/11603/28995In response to increasing violent attacks, the Stop the Bleed campaign recommends that everyone have access to both personal and public bleeding-control kits. There are currently no guidelines about how many bleeding victims public sites should be equipped to treat during a mass casualty incident. We conducted a retrospective review of intentional mass casualty incidents, including shootings, stabbings, vehicle attacks, and bombings, to determine the typical number of people who might benefit from immediate hemorrhage control by a bystander before professional medical help arrives. On the basis of our analysis, we recommend that planners at public venues consider equipping their sites with supplies to treat a minimum of 20 bleeding victims during an intentional mass casualty incident.6 pagesen-USThis work was written as part of one of the author's official duties as an Employee of the United States Government and is therefore a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 105, no copyright protection is available for such works under U.S. Law.Public Domain Mark 1.0http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/Text