Swan, ChristopherBrown, Bryan L.2023-08-102023-08-102014-05-15Swan, C.M. and Brown, B.L. (2014), Using rarity to infer how dendritic network structure shapes biodiversity in riverine communities. Ecography, 37: 993-1001. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.00496https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.00496http://hdl.handle.net/11603/29151Dispersal of organisms connects physical localities, but the strength of connection varies widely. Variability in the influence of dispersal can be predictable in sharply defined networks like river systems because some sections of the network are more isolated, leading to different balances of local (i.e. environmental filtering, species interactions) and regional (i.e. dispersal-driven) processes in structuring communities. We examined the influence of spatial isolation on the relative contributions of α- and β-diversity to regional (γ) diversity, and examined how that influence differed between common and rare species in stream macroinvertebrate communities. One explanation for rarity on a regional scale is that common species are habitat generalists while rare species are specialists. Therefore, common species should be influenced more by dispersal-driven processes while rare species should be more influenced by local processes. We predicted that for rare taxa, β-diversity should represent a higher fraction of γ-diversity in isolated headwaters but that differences between rare and common taxa with regard to the contribution of β-diversity to γ-diversity should be less distinct in well-connected mainstem habitats. To test these predictions, we used macroinvertebrate communities from 634 sites across 22 watersheds. Regardless of rarity, β- and γ-diversity were higher in headwaters compared to mainstems. However, α-diversity was similar regardless of isolation for rare assemblages. But contrary to our predictions, common assemblages of predators and herbivores did exhibit differences in α-diversity between locations. Our predictions were strongly supported for two guilds of consumers, the detritivores and collectors, but less so for herbivores and predators. However, these results make sense considering differences in life histories between the groups. For detritivores and collectors, species turnover (β-diversity) was higher in isolated regions in river networks, and rarity exacerbated this effect, resulting in higher regional diversity of rare species, supporting the general theory that rarity reflects habitat specialization.9 pagesen-USThis item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.Dispersal of organismsα- and β-diversityHabitat specializationRiver networksText