Center for Health Program Development and Management2019-07-092019-05-082005-04http://hdl.handle.net/11603/13793In response to recent dramatic increases in Medicaid spending, the Michigan legislature mandated a study evaluating the cost-effectiveness of capitated managed care involving multiple managed care organizations compared to three alternative delivery systems: fee-for-service, primary care case management, and a capitated managed care program involving a single statewide managed care organization. The Hilltop Institute (as the Center for Health Program Development and Management) was retained by the Michigan Department of Community Health to conduct this study.41 pagesen-USThis item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.alternate delivery services for providing Medicaid health carecomparison of costsCapitated managed care under multiple managed care organizations (MCOs)multiple managed care organizations (MCOs) Fee-for-service (FFS)Primary care case management (PCCM), a non-capitated form of managed careCapitated managed care under a single statewide MCOText