Catania, A. CharlesCutts, David2024-08-272024-08-271963-04Catania, A. Charles, and David Cutts. “Experimental Control of Superstitious Responding Inhumans.” Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 6, no. 2 (April 1963): 203–8. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1963.6-203.https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1963.6-203http://hdl.handle.net/11603/35841Superstitions were demonstrated with human subjects when presses on one button were reinforced on a VI 30-sec schedule while presses on a second were never reinforced. Superstitious responding, on the second button, was often maintained because presses on that button were frequently followed by reinforcement for a subsequent press on the first button. The introduction of a changeover delay (COD), which separated in time presses on the second button and subsequent reinforced presses on the first button, reduced or eliminated the superstitious responding of these subjects. Some complex superstitions were also demonstrated with other subjects for which the COD was in effect from the beginning of the session.6 pagesen-USThis item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.HumansReinforcement, PsychologySuperstitionsSUPERSTITIONSText