McTague, JohnDeckman, Melissa2024-05-072024-05-072015-01Deckman, Melissa and John McTague. 2015. “Did the War on Women Work? Women, Men, and the Birth Control Mandate in the 2012 Presidential Election.” American Politics Research 43 (1): 3-26.1532-673X10.1177/1532673X14535240http://hdl.handle.net/11603/33668Using a nationally representative data set (N = 3,000), the Public Religion Research Institute’s American Values Survey, we conduct multivariate regression analysis to determine the empirical impact of attitudes regarding the birth control mandate and abortion on presidential vote choice. We also conduct factor analysis to determine whether voters conceptualized the birth control mandate and abortion similarly. We find that support for the Obama administration’s birth control mandate was significantly related to voting for Obama for both women and men voters, although the impact was stronger for women. However, the impact of the “War on Women” rhetoric on voters’ choices was limited to the issue of insurance coverage for birth control rather than extending to the issue of abortion. Unlike attitudes about abortion, we find that voters conceptualized the birth control mandate less as a “culture war” issue and more as a “role of government” issue. Given this conceptualization of the mandate by voters, our findings reaffirm previous research that suggests that the gender gap in voting is largely driven by attitudinal differences regarding the role of government in providing social welfare benefits and equal opportunity for women.21 pagesen-USWar on womenGender gapAbortionBirth control mandateText