Miller, Nicholas R.2021-02-052021-02-052011-10-28Miller, Nicholas R.; Election Inversions by the U.S. Electoral College; In: Felsenthal D., Machover M. (eds) Electoral Systems. Studies in Choice and Welfare (2012); https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-20441-8_4https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20441-8_4http://hdl.handle.net/11603/209622010 Annual Meeting of the Public Choice Society, San Antonio, Texas, March 10-13, 2010An election inversion occurs when the candidate (or party) that wins the most votes from an electorate fails to win the most electoral votes (or parliamentary seats) and therefore loses the election. Public commentary commonly uses terms such as “reversal of winners,” “wrong winner,” “divided verdict,” and “misfire” to describe this phenomenon; the academic social choice literature adds such terms as “repre- sentative inconsistency,” “compound majority paradox,” “referendum paradox,” and “majority deficit.” Election inversions can occur under any two-tier electoral system, including the U.S. Electoral College. As is well known, the Electoral College actually produced a “wrong winner” in the 2000 Presidential election, and it has done so twice before.35 pagesen-USThis item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.Text