Remotely mapping gullying and incision in Maryland Piedmont headwater streams using repeat airborne lidar

dc.contributor.authorMetes, Marina J.
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Andrew J.
dc.contributor.authorBaker, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorHopkins, Kristina G.
dc.contributor.authorJones, Daniel K.
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-22T21:24:28Z
dc.date.available2025-01-22T21:24:28Z
dc.date.issued2024-06-15
dc.description.abstractHeadwater streams can contribute significant amounts of fine sediment to downstream waterways, especially when severely eroded and incised. Potential upstream sediment source identification is crucial for effective management of water quality, aquatic habitat, and sediment loads in a watershed. This study explored topographic openness (TO) derived from 1-m lidar for its ability to predict incision in headwater streams and to remotely detect changes in incision over time. Field surveys were conducted in one forested and two recently urbanized headwater watersheds in the Maryland Piedmont physiographic province, USA to characterize the level of stream channel incision (none, moderate, or severe) in the main stem of each watershed. Predictions of the severity of stream channel incision derived from TO were compared against the field surveys. Channel incision was detected with an overall accuracy of 67�%, with best performance in reaches with either severe or no incision (79��% accuracy). The method was also applied to repeat lidar collected over the same area to model the extent of channel incision in 2002 before urban development began and in 2008 and 2013 during active construction in the urban watersheds. Results showed increasing incision over time in all three watersheds, with similar patterns in the forested and urban watersheds. This new method of remotely measuring channel incision can be used to identify potential sediment sources across a watershed, enhance water and habitat quality predictions, and detect changes over time where multiple years of overlapping lidar are available.
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the U.S. Geological Survey, National Land Imaging Program. Any use of trade, firm, or product name is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. All photos by Marina Metes (USGS) unless otherwise indicated. We thank Rachel Atkins (USGS) and two anonymous reviewers for their comments that greatly improved this manuscript
dc.description.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169555X24001557
dc.format.extent13 pages
dc.genrejournal articles
dc.identifierdoi:10.13016/m2rato-rdbg
dc.identifier.citationMetes, Marina J., Andrew J. Miller, Matthew E. Baker, Kristina G. Hopkins, and Daniel K. Jones. 揜emotely Mapping Gullying and Incision in Maryland Piedmont Headwater Streams Using Repeat Airborne Lidar.� Geomorphology 455 (June 15, 2024): 109205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2024.109205.
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2024.109205
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11603/37363
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.isAvailableAtThe University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC)
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Geography and Environmental Systems Department
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Faculty Collection
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Center for Urban Environmental Research and Education (CUERE)
dc.rightsTHIS WORK WAS WRITTEN AS PART OF ONE OF THE AUTHOR'S OFFICIAL DUTIES AS AN EMPLOYEE OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AND IS THEREFORE A WORK OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT. IN ACCORDANCE WITH 17 U.S.C. 105, NO COPYRIGHT PROTECTION IS AVAILABLE FOR SUCH WORKS UNDER U.S. LAW.
dc.rightsPUBLIC DOMAIN
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/public-domain/pdm/
dc.subjectErosion
dc.subjectGIS
dc.subjectHeadwater streams
dc.subjectIncision
dc.subjectLidar
dc.subjectRemote sensing
dc.titleRemotely mapping gullying and incision in Maryland Piedmont headwater streams using repeat airborne lidar
dc.typeText
dcterms.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5069-0204

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1s2.0S0169555X24001557main.pdf
Size:
9.79 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1s2.0S0169555X24001557mmc1.pdf
Size:
116.87 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format