Coordinating Care for Dual Eligibles: Options for Linking State Medicaid Programs with Medicare Advantage Special Needs Plans
Links to Fileshttps://www.hilltopinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/publications/Coordinating-Care-for-Dual-Eligibles-Options-for-Linking-State-Medicaid-Programs-with-Medicare-Advantage-Special-Needs-Plans-pdf.pdf
MetadataShow full item record
Type of Work12 pages
Citation of Original PublicationCHARLES J. MILLIGAN, JR., AND CYNTHIA H. WOODCOCK, Coordinating Care for Dual Eligibles: Options for Linking State Medicaid Programs with Medicare Advantage Special Needs Plans, Commonwealth Fund pub. 1109 Vol. 32, https://www.hilltopinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/publications/Coordinating-Care-for-Dual-Eligibles-Options-for-Linking-State-Medicaid-Programs-with-Medicare-Advantage-Special-Needs-Plans-pdf.pdf
RightsThis item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.
Subjectscoordinating care for dual eligibles
models for linking state Medicaid Programs with Medicare Advance Special Needs Plans
individuals who qualify both for Medicare and Medicaid benefits
factors that influence the choice of models
States that aim to develop Medicare Advantage Special Needs Plans for dual eligibles may choose from among three potential models discussed in this issue brief: 1) a Medicaid program in which the beneficiary voluntarily enrolls in a single managed care organization (MCO) that delivers both Medicaid and Medicare services; 2) a program in which the beneficiary is required to enroll in a Medicaid MCO but retains freedom of choice regarding whether to enroll in a capitated Medicare plan; and 3) an administrative services organization (ASO) approach, in which Medicaid retains a vendor to coordinate Medicaid services with the SNPs operating in the state. This issue brief also provides guidance on contractual issues important to state Medicaid agencies, and discusses environmental factors that influence the choice of models and the program’s prospects for success.