“One Difficulty…of a Serious Nature”: The Overlooked Racial Dynamics of the Electoral College
Loading...
Author/Creator
Author/Creator ORCID
Date
2019-09-13
Type of Work
Department
Program
Citation of Original Publication
William D. Blake; “One Difficulty…of a Serious Nature”: The Overlooked Racial Dynamics of the Electoral College; The Forum 17,2; https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2019-0019
Rights
This item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.
Access to this item will begin on 2020-09-13
Access to this item will begin on 2020-09-13
Abstract
This paper explores the racial origins and legacy of the Electoral College through historical and quantitative analyses. At the Constitutional Convention, the Electoral College served the interests of Southern slaveowners by perpetuating the advantage of the Three-Fifths Compromise. Following Reconstruction, Southern states that disenfranchised African Americans received an even larger voice in the Electoral College. Republicans tried to counter these moves by admitting unusually small states into the union. The ironic consequence of this nonracial decision is that, today, these states are heavily White and have citizens with higher levels of racial resentment. A MM-regression analysis of every election from 2000 on indicates the Electoral College has consistently awarded more votes per capita to states with Whiter populations and more racially conservative attitudes. The racially-disparate power exerted by these states makes it more difficult to enact racially-egalitarian policies. This paper adds a new perspective to the normative debate over the Electoral College, which typically focuses on democratic fairness and federalism concerns.