Pyrrhic Victories: How the Secularization Doctrine Undermines the Sanctity of Religion

Thumbnail Image

Files

SSRN-id1631349.pdf (507.29 KB)

Links to Files

https://academic.oup.com/jcs/article-abstract/55/1/1/807066

Permanent Link

https://doi.org/10.1093/jcs/csr111
 http://hdl.handle.net/11603/19246

Collections

UMBC Political Science
UMBC Faculty Collection

Author/Creator

Author/Creator ORCID

Date

2011-11-15

Type of Work

journal articles preprints
Text

Department

Program

Citation of Original Publication

William D. Blake, Pyrrhic Victories: How the Secularization Doctrine Undermines the Sanctity of Religion, Journal of Church and State, Volume 55, Issue 1, Winter 2013, Pages 1–22, https://doi.org/10.1093/jcs/csr111

Rights

This item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.
This article has been accepted for publication in Journal of Church and State Published by Oxford University Press.

Subjects

Abstract

The Supreme Court has sanctioned displays of Christian crèches,1 Jewish menorahs,2 and the Judeo-Christian Ten Commandments.3 Lower courts have rejected Establishment Clause claims against the display of the Latin cross on public property.4 All of these decisions justify the inclusion of religious symbols in public venues on the grounds that they are not actually religious. Though this rationale seems to embrace a bizarre contradiction, federal courts have ruled that in these particular contexts, the government is not recognizing the religious importance of these icons but rather the secular or historical values that the symbols also underscore. Alternatively, courts have declared that the placement of secular symbols near the religious ones effectively wash away their theological significance. Ironically, many.