The impact of tidal errors on the determination of the Lense-Thirring effect from satellite laser ranging
MetadataShow full item record
Type of Work25 pages
journal articles preprints
Citation of Original PublicationErricos C. Pavlis and Lorenzo Iorio, The impact of tidal errors on the determination of the Lense-Thirring effect from satellite laser ranging, International Journal of Modern Physics D, Vol. 11, No. 04, pp. 599-618 (2002), doi: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271802001883
RightsThis item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.
Preprint of an article published in International Journal of Modern Physics D,Vol. 11, No. 04, pp. 599-618, 2002, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271802001883 ©2020 World Scientific Publishing Company https://www.worldscientific.com/worldscinet/ijmpd.
The general relativistic Lense–Thirring effect can be detected by means of a suitable combination of orbital residuals of the laser-ranged LAGEOS and LAGEOS II satellites. While this observable is not affected by the orbital perturbation induced by the zonal Earth solid and ocean tides, it is sensitive to those generated by the tesseral and sectorial tides. The assessment of their influence on the measurement of the parameter μLT, with which the gravitomagnetic effect is accounted for, is the goal of this paper. After simulating the combined residual curve by calculating accurately the mismodeling of the more effective tidal perturbations, it has been found that, while the solid tides affect the recovery of μLT at a level always well below 1%, for the ocean tides and the other long-period signals Δμ depends strongly on the observational period and the noise level: Δμtides ≃ 2% after seven years. The aliasing effect of K11=3 p=1 tide and SRP(4241) solar radiation pressure harmonic, with periods longer than four years, on the perigee of LAGEOS II yield to a maximum systematic uncertainty on μLT of less than 4% over different observational periods. The zonal 18.6-year tide does not affect the combined residuals.