“Other” behavior and the DRO: The roles of extinction and reinforcement

Author/Creator ORCID

Date

2020-07-07

Department

Program

Citation of Original Publication

Hangen, Marcella M.; Romero, Ashley N.; Neidert, Pamela L.; Borrero, John C.; “Other” behavior and the DRO: The roles of extinction and reinforcement; Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 53,4, 2385-2404 (2020); https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jaba.736

Rights

This item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.
This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Hangen, Marcella M.; Romero, Ashley N.; Neidert, Pamela L.; Borrero, John C.; “Other” behavior and the DRO: The roles of extinction and reinforcement; Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 53,4, 2385-2404 (2020); https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jaba.736, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.736.
Access to this item will begin on 2021-07-07

Subjects

Abstract

Jessel et al. (2015) provided some evidence to suggest that “other” behavior is strengthened in the differential reinforcement of other behavior (DRO). The present study is a systematic replication of the Jessel et al. procedures. The effects of DRO and extinction on target responding, target-other responding (a response with an established history of reinforcement), and nontarget-other responding emitted by children with intellectual and developmental disabilities and children with no known diagnoses were compared. Other behavior increased in at least one DRO condition for each participant, suggesting that other behavior increases when using DRO, at least initially. Under extinction, target responding and target-other responding decreased to low rates for three of the five participants; however, rates of nontarget-other responding were elevated compared to the DRO condition. These results suggest that increased rates of target-other responding and nontarget-other responding during the DRO condition may be a result of extinction-induced variability.