Bound by Children: Intermittent Cohabitation and Living Together Apart

Author/Creator ORCID

Date

2011-11-02

Department

Program

Citation of Original Publication

Cross-Barnet, Caitlin; Cherlin, Andrew; Burton, Linda; Bound by Children: Intermittent Cohabitation and Living Together Apart; Family Relations, 60, 5, pages 633-647, 2 November, 2011; https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2011.00664.x

Rights

This item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.
This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Cross-Barnet, Caitlin; Cherlin, Andrew; Burton, Linda; Bound by Children: Intermittent Cohabitation and Living Together Apart; Family Relations, 60, 5, pages 633-647, 2 November, 2011; https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741- 3729.2011.00664.x, which has been published in final form at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2011.00664.x

Subjects

Abstract

In this article, we examine variations in low-income mothers' patterns of intermittent cohabitation and the voluntary and involuntary nature of these unions. Intermittent cohabitation involves couples living together and separating in repeating cycles. Using Three-City Study ethnographic data, we identified 45 low-income mothers involved in these arrangements, 18 of whom resided with their children's fathers occasionally while saying that they were not in a cohabiting relationship. We term such relationships living together apart (LTA). Data analysis revealed that distinct patterns of voluntary and involuntary separations and reunifications characterized intermittent cohabitation and LTA and that these relationships were shaped by the bonds that shared parenting created and the economic needs of both parents. We argue that these dimensions may explain some disparate accounts of cohabitation status in low-income populations. They also demonstrate previously unexplored diversity in cohabiting relationships and suggest further questioning contemporary definitions of families.