Assessing healthcare quality using routine data: evaluating the performance of the national tuberculosis programme in South Africa
Loading...
Links to Files
Collections
Author/Creator
Author/Creator ORCID
Date
2016-11-25
Type of Work
Department
Program
Citation of Original Publication
McLaren, Zoe et al.; Assessing healthcare quality using routine data: evaluating the performance of the national tuberculosis programme in South Africa; Tropical Medicine & International Health, 22, 2, pages 171-179, 25 November, 2016; https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.12819
Rights
This item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.
This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: McLaren, Zoe et al.; Assessing healthcare quality using routine data: evaluating the performance of the national tuberculosis programme in South Africa; Tropical Medicine & International Health, 22, 2, pages 171-179, 25 November, 2016; https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.12819, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.12819.This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. This article may not be enhanced, enriched or otherwise transformed into a derivative work, without express permission from Wiley or by statutory rights under applicable legislation. Copyright notices must not be removed, obscured or modified. The article must be linked to Wiley’s version of record on Wiley Online Library and any embedding, framing or otherwise making available the article or pages thereof by third parties from platforms, services and websites other than Wiley Online Library must be prohibited.
This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: McLaren, Zoe et al.; Assessing healthcare quality using routine data: evaluating the performance of the national tuberculosis programme in South Africa; Tropical Medicine & International Health, 22, 2, pages 171-179, 25 November, 2016; https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.12819, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.12819.This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. This article may not be enhanced, enriched or otherwise transformed into a derivative work, without express permission from Wiley or by statutory rights under applicable legislation. Copyright notices must not be removed, obscured or modified. The article must be linked to Wiley’s version of record on Wiley Online Library and any embedding, framing or otherwise making available the article or pages thereof by third parties from platforms, services and websites other than Wiley Online Library must be prohibited.
Subjects
Abstract
Objective
To assess the performance of healthcare facilities by means of indicators based on guidelines for clinical care of TB, which is likely a good measure of overall facility quality.
Methods
We assessed quality of care in all public health facilities in South Africa using graphical, correlation and locally weighted kernel regression analysis of routine TB test data.
Results
Facility performance falls short of national standards of care. Only 74% of patients with TB provided a second specimen for testing, 18% received follow-up testing and 14% received drug resistance testing. Only resistance testing rates improved over time, tripling between 2004 and 2011. National awareness campaigns and changes in clinical guidelines had only a transient impact on testing rates. The poorest performing facilities remained at the bottom of the rankings over the period of study.
Conclusion
The optimal policy strategy requires both broad-based policies and targeted resources to poor performers. This approach to assessing facility quality of care can be adapted to other contexts and also provides a low-cost method for evaluating the effectiveness of proposed interventions. Devising targeted policies based on routine data is a cost-effective way to improve the quality of public health care provided.