Utopia within Dystopia: Stand on Zanzibar as Speculative Postcolonial Literature
Links to Fileshttp://blogs.goucher.edu/verge/9-2/
MetadataShow full item record
Type of Work11 p.
RightsCollection may be protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. To obtain information or permission to publish or reproduce, please contact the Goucher Special Collections & Archives at 410-337-6347 or email email@example.com.
SubjectsResearch -- Periodicals.
Humanities -- Research -- Periodicals.
Social sciences -- Research -- Periodicals.
The science fiction genre is a forgotten stepchild in the literary family; great writers can be marginalized by their choice to delve into the fantastic, while some excellent speculative novels face an uphill battle to remain within the genre because they are so good that critical praise becomes evidence of transcendence. When one of my classmates shared a video clip of an interview with John Brunner discussing his work, one thing stood out for me against the backdrop of his success and obvious enjoyment of that success: he seemed to have a need to defend the quality of the work and its place within the genre, as if he feared being remembered only as a good science fiction writer and not as a great writer like those who influenced him. At the start of my search for relevant scholarship for this paper, I felt challenged to locate a conceptual tether that would lead me deep enough into John Brunner's Stand on Zanzibar to discover something new within it, or perhaps a new way to understand it. Brunner published the novel in 1968, when many nations in the "global south" were moving towards or had already sprung free from their colonial shackles. I found that using a postcolonial lens to delve deeper into the choices and movements of Brunner's characters created more complex and nuanced revelations in my analysis, and I found myself agreeing with Brunner: the work is more than "just" science fiction, and he was more than "just" a science fiction writer. The tools a writer uses to tell his story should ideally be the best tools for the job - and the exercise of collecting, examining and appropriating each tool within its rightful box is the job of the critically-thinking and open-minded reader.