Comment on “Observation of large and all-season ozone losses over the tropics” [AIP Adv. 12, 075006 (2022)]

Thumbnail Image

Files

5.0121723.pdf (4.05 MB)

Links to Files

https://aip.scitation.org/doi/full/10.1063/5.0121723

Permanent Link

https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0121723
 http://hdl.handle.net/11603/26553

Collections

UMBC Joint Center for Earth Systems Technology (JCET)
UMBC Faculty Collection

Author/Creator

Author/Creator ORCID

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7829-0920

Date

2022-12-08

Type of Work

journal articles
Text

Department

Program

Citation of Original Publication

Martyn P. Chipperfield, Andreas Chrysanthou, Robert Damadeo, Martin Dameris, Sandip S. Dhomse, Vitali Fioletov, Stacey M. Frith, Sophie Godin-Beekmann, Birgit Hassler, Jane Liu, Rolf Müller, Irina Petropavlovskikh, Michelle L. Santee, Ryan M. Stauffer, David Tarasick, Anne M. Thompson, Mark Weber, and Paul J. Young , "Comment on “Observation of large and all-season ozone losses over the tropics” [AIP Adv. 12, 075006 (2022)]", AIP Advances 12, 129102 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0121723

Rights

This work was written as part of one of the author's official duties as an Employee of the United States Government and is therefore a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 105, no copyright protection is available for such works under U.S. Law.
Public Domain Mark 1.0

Subjects

Abstract

Lu (2022) (hereafter L2022) used the Trajectory-mapped Ozonesonde dataset for the Stratosphere and Troposphere (TOST) to argue that there has been very substantial ozone depletion (>80%) in the tropical (30°S–30°N) lower stratosphere (LS) since the 1960s. This was labeled a “large and all-season ozone hole.” Here, we show that this claim is false due to erroneously large tropical ozone values in the interpolated sparse historical TOST data. In addition, L2022 repeats the suggestion made in a number of the author’s earlier papers that cosmic rays are involved in stratospheric ozone depletion. This claim is also not valid; a huge body of work has explained the observed stratospheric ozone depletion through a well-established gas phase and heterogeneous chemistry following the emission of ozone-depleting substances (ODSs) through human activities. We expand on these points below. In particular, we present a simple analysis of the TOST dataset used by L2022 and show its unsuitability for the application performed. In contrast, we then summarize the much smaller observed variations in ozone in the tropical LS based on many international efforts of data validation and quality assurance, which are not cited by L2022. We then discuss flaws in the cosmic-ray electron-induced mechanism proposed by L2022 as being the main driver of stratospheric ozone losses.