Democratization Theorists and Transitional West African States
Links to Fileshttp://blogs.goucher.edu/verge/verge-1/
MetadataShow full item record
Type of Work21 p.
RightsCollection may be protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. To obtain information or permission to publish or reproduce, please contact the Goucher Special Collections & Archives at 410-337-6347 or email firstname.lastname@example.org.
SubjectsResearch -- Periodicals.
Humanities -- Research -- Periodicals.
Social sciences -- Research -- Periodicals.
I developed an interest in democratization when studying twentieth century Latin American history. I quickly learned that “democratization” comprises an entire field within political science. The distinction between an authoritarian regime and an elected government is not always a stark contrast; in truth, the differences between the two forms of government in many areas of the world are nuanced. Many years may elapse before a given country becomes truly “democratic.” This interim period is a “transitional” time when governments may or may not relapse. In this way, the extent of democratization in a given country may be ordered on a continuum relative to other countries. Political events, natural disasters, internal or external conflicts, among countless other factors, influences whether a given country becomes “more” or “less” democratic over time. The body of social science literature examining these processes attempts to offer substantive recommendations for achieving “more democracy.” Africa is a continent sorely in need of this advice. The purpose of my paper is to question the relevance of a few selected theorists.