Attaining Status at the Expense of Likeability: Pilfering Power Through Conversational Interruption
Permanent Link
10.1007/s10919-008-0054-xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11603/4034
Collections
Metadata
Show full item recordAuthor/Creator
Date
2008Type of Work
22 pagesText
journal articles
Citation of Original Publication
Farley, S. D. (December 01, 2008). Attaining Status at the Expense of Likeability: Pilfering Power Through Conversational Interruption. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 32, 4, 241-260.Abstract
Do status expectations affect how we interpret interruption in conversation? Two experiments examined how interrupters and their targets are perceived in same- and mixed-gender dyads. In Experiment 1, participants listened to a brief audiotaped conversation in which one person interrupted the other five times. In Experiment 2, four confederates (two men and two women) systematically interrupted naïve participants while discussing an article. In general, interrupters gained in status and targets of interruption lost status. In addition, participants who were interrupted rated themselves as less influential than those who were not interrupted. As expected, interrupters, especially female interrupters, were liked less than those who did not interrupt. Theoretical implications are discussed.