Effects of Role Stressors Appraised as Challenges and Hindrances on Work Outcomes
Links to Files
Permanent Link
Collections
Author/Creator
Author/Creator ORCID
Date
Department
University of Baltimore. Yale Gordon College of Arts and Sciences
Program
Master of Science in Applied Psychology
Citation of Original Publication
Rights
This item may be protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. It is made available by the University of Baltimore for non-commercial research and educational purposes.
Abstract
This study examines the moderating effects of stressor appraisal as a challenge, hindrance, both, or neither among 237 full-time employees who completed surveys via MTurk. Utilizing the Transactional Model of stress, it was predicted that correlations between each of role ambiguity, role conflict, and role overload would negatively relate with general well-being, affective commitment, and job satisfaction, and positively relate with tedium, anxiety, and turnover intentions. Second, it was expected that when appraising a role stressor as a high challenge (vs. a high hindrance) the deleterious effects of stressors on outcomes would be weaker. The first prediction is supported; however, the second set of predictions are only partially supported. The appraisal of a stressor as a hindrance indicates stronger deleterious effects on psychological strains, specifically anxiety and tedium. Whereas, when stressors, specifically role conflict, are appraised as a challenge, there appears to be a modest buffering effect on general well-being and job satisfaction. Third, this study examined a three-way interaction between each of the role stressors, and the appraisal of a stressor as a (high or low) challenge and a (high or low) hindrance. Results indicate that role conflict appraised as a low hindrance and a high challenge mitigates the deleterious relationship between role conflict and tedium. In fact, when role conflict is appraised as a high hindrance and a low challenge, the positive relationship between role conflict and tedium intensifies. Furthermore, when role conflict is appraised as a high hindrance and as a high challenge, there is little to no protection from the deleterious effects of role conflict on tedium. These findings further highlight the importance of self-appraisal and indicate that challenge stressors do not always lead to positive outcomes, but perceiving stressors as challenges may help to mitigate negative outcomes.