Denmark and France: A Counterterrorism Case Study, Counterterrorism Strategies and the Infringement of Returning Foreign Fighters’ Human Rights

dc.contributor.advisorHonick, Amalia
dc.contributor.advisorBarqueiro, Carla
dc.contributor.advisorSt. Ours, Kathryn
dc.contributor.authorRosen, Nancy
dc.contributor.departmentCenter for People, Politics, & Markets: International Relationsen_US
dc.contributor.programBachelor's Degreeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-17T14:12:59Z
dc.date.available2019-05-17T14:12:59Z
dc.date.issued2019-05-16
dc.description.abstractThrough a comparison of two case studies – Denmark and France – this paper seeks to analyze counterterrorism strategies for returning foreign fighters and the extent the strategies infringe on their human rights. The analysis will be conducted through examining the specific policies, legislation, and programs of Denmark and France regarding counterterrorism strategies. Two theories – the expanded criminal justice model (ECJM) and the critical terrorism studies (CTS) model – will be used to analyze these documents and programs and the extent to which human rights are infringed upon. Denmark and France were chosen as case studies to compare due to both having an increase in severity of terrorist attacks beginning in 2015 and continuing to the present in 2019. Furthermore, they are relatively similar in terms of the legislation and policies they have implemented. However, two points of divergence are evident. Firstly, Denmark has established robust exit and reintegration programs for foreign fighters returning home. Secondly, religious and cultural differences are acknowledged in the Danish programs, which, due to secularism, are aspects that are disregarded in France’s counterterrorism strategies. These two variables will be analyzed to see if they account for a divergent outcome – a difference in the degree of infringement on human rights for returning foreign fighters in Denmark and France.en_US
dc.format.extent101 pagesen_US
dc.genresenior thesisen_US
dc.identifierdoi:10.13016/m2da0m-mbmg
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11603/13885
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.isAvailableAtGoucher College, Baltimore, MD
dc.rightsCollection may be protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. To obtain information or permission to publish or reproduce, please contact the Goucher Special Collections & Archives at 410-337-6347 or email archives@goucher.edu.
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectFranceen_US
dc.subjectDenmarken_US
dc.subjectCounterterrorism Strategiesen_US
dc.subjectReturning Foreign Fightersen_US
dc.subjectReintegration Programsen_US
dc.subjectHuman Rightsen_US
dc.subjectExpanded Criminal Justice Modelen_US
dc.subjectCritical Terrorism Studies Modelen_US
dc.subjectInfringement of Human Rightsen_US
dc.subjectLegislationen_US
dc.subjectCounterterrorismen_US
dc.titleDenmark and France: A Counterterrorism Case Study, Counterterrorism Strategies and the Infringement of Returning Foreign Fighters’ Human Rightsen_US
dc.typeTexten_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
NancyRosen SeniorThesis.pdf
Size:
817.06 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Senior Thesis: International Relations
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.6 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: