4MS AGE-FRIENDLY HEALTHCARE INITIATIVE IMPLEMENTATION ON AN ACUTE CARE FOR ELDERS UNIT

dc.contributor.authorWilson, Lucy
dc.contributor.authorRick, Chelsea
dc.contributor.authorWelch, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorNelson, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorLawson, Olivia
dc.contributor.authorBoren, Hannah
dc.contributor.authorDuggan, Mariu
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-11T13:30:06Z
dc.date.available2024-06-11T13:30:06Z
dc.date.issued2022-12-20
dc.description.abstractAlthough evidence supports 4Ms [Medication, Mentation, What Matters Most (WMM), Mobility] care for older adults, successful implementation at an academic hospital is not well described. The aim of this study was to describe the implementation methods and process measures for 4Ms delivery on the Acute Care for Elders (ACE) unit at an academic hospital. We used the Institute for Healthcare Improvement’s Model for Improvement to guide efforts. We set SMART goals for each M: best possible medication reconciliation, identification of potentially inappropriate medications, and recommendations to deprescribe (medication), delirium screen documented 2x/day and delirium nonpharmacologic protocol in place (mentation), documentation of WMM and care alignment (WMM), Johns Hopkins-Highest Level of Mobility screen assessed during the patient’s hospitalization, mobilization of patient 3x/day offered and documented, and restraints avoided (mobility). We mapped current and ideal workflows. We sought community grant funding to expand the implementation team, supporting a nurse educator to train the unit and data analyst to extract real-time data from the electronic medical record to inform improvement processes. Multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles were run iteratively and discussed at weekly team meetings. We included patients >65 years old, admitted for >48 hours, and excluded patients admitted on hospice. Of 519 eligible patients admitted from 04/2021-01/2022, goals were met by 454 (87%) for medication, 187 (36%) for mentation, 130 (25%) for WMM, and 6 (1%) for mobility. We found implementing 4M care processes at an academic hospital to be feasible. Further exploration of barriers to meeting the mobility target is warranted.
dc.description.urihttps://academic.oup.com/innovateage/article/6/Supplement_1/530/6938147
dc.format.extent2 pages
dc.genreconference papers and proceedings
dc.identifierdoi:10.13016/m2pqlm-qici
dc.identifier.citationWilson, Lucy, Chelsea Rick, Sarah Welch, Sarah Nelson, Olivia Lawson, Hannah Boren, and Mariu Duggan. “4MS AGE-FRIENDLY HEALTHCARE INITIATIVE IMPLEMENTATION ON AN ACUTE CARE FOR ELDERS UNIT.” Innovation in Aging 6, no. Supplement_1 (November 1, 2022): 530–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igac059.2021.
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igac059.2021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11603/34556
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.relation.isAvailableAtThe University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC)
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Faculty Collection
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Emergency and Distaster Health Systems
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0 DEED Attribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.title4MS AGE-FRIENDLY HEALTHCARE INITIATIVE IMPLEMENTATION ON AN ACUTE CARE FOR ELDERS UNIT
dc.typeText
dcterms.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0092-1750

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
igac059.2021.pdf
Size:
150.08 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format