Empirically Evaluating an Adaptable Spoken Dialogue System
Collections
Author/Creator
Author/Creator ORCID
Date
Department
Program
Citation of Original Publication
Litman, Diane J., and Shimei Pan. “Empirically Evaluating an Adaptable Spoken Dialogue System.” In UM99 User Modeling, edited by Judy Kay, 55–64. Vienna: Springer, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-2490-1_6.
Rights
This item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.
Subjects
Abstract
Recent technological advances have made it possible to build real-time, interactive spoken dialogue systems for a wide variety of applications. However, when users do not respect the limitations of such systems, performance typically degrades. Although users differ with respect to their knowledge of system limitations, and although different dialogue strategies make system limitations more apparent to users, most current systems do not try to improve performance by adapting dialogue behavior to individual users. This paper presents an empirical evaluation of TOOT, an adaptable spoken dialogue system for retrieving train schedules on the web. We conduct an experiment in which 20 users carry out 4 tasks with both adaptable and non-adaptable versions of TOOT, resulting in a corpus of 80 dialogues. The values for a wide range of evaluation measures are then extracted from this corpus. Our results show that adaptable TOOT generally outperforms non-adaptable TOOT, and that the utility of adaptation depends on TOOT’s initial dialogue strategies.