Equipping Public Spaces to Facilitate Rapid Point-of-Injury Hemorrhage Control After Mass Casualty
Loading...
Collections
Author/Creator ORCID
Date
2019-01-16
Type of Work
Department
Program
Citation of Original Publication
Goolsby, Craig, Kandra Strauss-Riggs, Michael Rozenfeld, Nathan Charlton, Eric Goralnick, Kobi Peleg, Matthew J. Levy, Tim Davis, and Nicole Hurst. “Equipping Public Spaces to Facilitate Rapid Point-of-Injury Hemorrhage Control After Mass Casualty.” American Journal of Public Health 109, no. 2 (February 2019): 236–41. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304773.
Rights
This work was written as part of one of the author's official duties as an Employee of the United States Government and is therefore a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 105, no copyright protection is available for such works under U.S. Law.
Public Domain Mark 1.0
Public Domain Mark 1.0
Subjects
Abstract
In response to increasing violent attacks, the Stop the Bleed
campaign recommends that everyone have access to both personal
and public bleeding-control
kits. There are currently no
guidelines about how many
bleeding victims public sites
should be equipped to treat
during a mass casualty incident.
We conducted a retrospective review of intentional mass
casualty incidents, including shootings, stabbings, vehicle attacks,
and bombings, to determine
the typical number of people
who might benefit from immediate hemorrhage control
by a bystander before professional medical help arrives.
On the basis of our analysis,
we recommend that planners
at public venues consider equipping their sites with supplies to
treat a minimum of 20 bleeding
victims during an intentional mass
casualty incident.