An Examination of Vote Verification Technologies: Findings and Experiences from the Maryland Study
dc.contributor.author | Sherman, Alan T. | |
dc.contributor.author | Gangopadhyay, Aryya | |
dc.contributor.author | Holden, Stephen H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Karabatis, George | |
dc.contributor.author | Koru, A. Gunes | |
dc.contributor.author | Law, Chris M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Norris, Donald F. | |
dc.contributor.author | Pinkston, John | |
dc.contributor.author | Sears, Andrew | |
dc.contributor.author | Zhang, Dongsong | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-02-21T19:22:35Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-02-21T19:22:35Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2006-04-15 | |
dc.description.abstract | We describe our findings and experiences from our technical review of vote verification systems for the Maryland State Board of Elections (SBE). The review included the following four systems for possible use together with Maryland’s existing Diebold AccuVote-TS (touch screen) voting system: VoteHere Sentinel; SCYTL Pnyx.DRE; MIT-Selker audio system; Diebold voter verified paper audit trail. As a baseline, we also examined the SBE’s procedures for “parallel testing” of its Diebold system. For each system, we examined how it enables voters who use touch screens to verify that their votes are cast as intended, recorded as cast, and reported as recorded. We also examined how well it permits post-election auditing. To this end, we considered implementation, impact on current state voting processes and procedures, impact on voting, functional completeness, security against fraud, attack and failure, reliability, accessibility, and voter privacy. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Support for this research was provided in part by the Maryland State Board of Elections. | en_US |
dc.description.uri | https://www.usenix.org/legacy/events/evt06/tech/full_papers/sherman/sherman.pdf | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 14 pages | en_US |
dc.genre | conference papers and proceedings preprints | en_US |
dc.identifier | doi:10.13016/m2y3cv-76d1 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11603/12840 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.relation.isAvailableAt | The University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC) | |
dc.relation.ispartof | UMBC Center for Research and Exploration in Space Sciences & Technology II (CRSST II) | |
dc.relation.ispartof | UMBC Faculty Collection | |
dc.relation.ispartof | UMBC Computer Science and Electrical Engineering Department | |
dc.relation.ispartof | UMBC Information Systems Department | |
dc.relation.ispartof | UMBC School of Public Policy | |
dc.relation.ispartof | UMBC Maryland Institute for Policy Analysis & Research (MIPAR) | |
dc.rights | This item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author. | |
dc.subject | diebold accuvoteTS | en_US |
dc.subject | diebold VVPAT | en_US |
dc.subject | direct recording equipment (DRE) | en_US |
dc.subject | computer system security | en_US |
dc.subject | electronic voting systems | en_US |
dc.subject | information assurance | en_US |
dc.subject | maryland state board of elections | en_US |
dc.subject | MIT Selker VVAATT | en_US |
dc.subject | parallel testing | en_US |
dc.subject | scytl pnyx.DRE | en_US |
dc.subject | VoteHere Sentinel | en_US |
dc.subject | vote verification technology | en_US |
dc.title | An Examination of Vote Verification Technologies: Findings and Experiences from the Maryland Study | en_US |
dc.type | Text | en_US |