An Examination of Vote Verification Technologies: Findings and Experiences from the Maryland Study

dc.contributor.authorSherman, Alan T.
dc.contributor.authorGangopadhyay, Aryya
dc.contributor.authorHolden, Stephen H.
dc.contributor.authorKarabatis, George
dc.contributor.authorKoru, A. Gunes
dc.contributor.authorLaw, Chris M.
dc.contributor.authorNorris, Donald F.
dc.contributor.authorPinkston, John
dc.contributor.authorSears, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Dongsong
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-21T19:22:35Z
dc.date.available2019-02-21T19:22:35Z
dc.date.issued2006-04-15
dc.description.abstractWe describe our findings and experiences from our technical review of vote verification systems for the Maryland State Board of Elections (SBE). The review included the following four systems for possible use together with Maryland’s existing Diebold AccuVote-TS (touch screen) voting system: VoteHere Sentinel; SCYTL Pnyx.DRE; MIT-Selker audio system; Diebold voter verified paper audit trail. As a baseline, we also examined the SBE’s procedures for “parallel testing” of its Diebold system. For each system, we examined how it enables voters who use touch screens to verify that their votes are cast as intended, recorded as cast, and reported as recorded. We also examined how well it permits post-election auditing. To this end, we considered implementation, impact on current state voting processes and procedures, impact on voting, functional completeness, security against fraud, attack and failure, reliability, accessibility, and voter privacy.en
dc.description.sponsorshipSupport for this research was provided in part by the Maryland State Board of Elections.en
dc.description.urihttps://www.usenix.org/legacy/events/evt06/tech/full_papers/sherman/sherman.pdfen
dc.format.extent14 pagesen
dc.genreconference papers and proceedings preprintsen
dc.identifierdoi:10.13016/m2y3cv-76d1
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11603/12840
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.isAvailableAtThe University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC)
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Center for Research and Exploration in Space Sciences & Technology II (CRSST II)
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Faculty Collection
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Computer Science and Electrical Engineering Department
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Information Systems Department
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC School of Public Policy
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Maryland Institute for Policy Analysis & Research (MIPAR)
dc.rightsThis item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.
dc.subjectdiebold accuvoteTSen
dc.subjectdiebold VVPATen
dc.subjectdirect recording equipment (DRE)en
dc.subjectcomputer system securityen
dc.subjectelectronic voting systemsen
dc.subjectinformation assuranceen
dc.subjectmaryland state board of electionsen
dc.subjectMIT Selker VVAATTen
dc.subjectparallel testingen
dc.subjectscytl pnyx.DREen
dc.subjectVoteHere Sentinelen
dc.subjectvote verification technologyen
dc.titleAn Examination of Vote Verification Technologies: Findings and Experiences from the Maryland Studyen
dc.typeTexten

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ShermanEVT2006.pdf
Size:
450.25 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.56 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: