Cross-Sectional Survey of High-Risk Pregnant Women's Opinions on COVID-19 Vaccination

dc.contributor.authorDesJardin, Marcia
dc.contributor.authorRaff, Edward
dc.contributor.authorBaranco, Nicholas
dc.contributor.authorMastrogiannis, Dimitrios
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-19T20:42:05Z
dc.date.available2022-07-19T20:42:05Z
dc.date.issued2022-06-29
dc.description.abstractBackground: Pregnant women are at increased risk of severe disease with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Despite strong recommendations from American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine for vaccination, COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy persists. With this study, we aim to evaluate opinions about the COVID-19 vaccine in a cohort of high-risk pregnant patients. Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained. Patients attending a regional Maternal–Fetal Medicine clinic in central New York were surveyed about the COVID-19 vaccine using a standardized questionnaire. Demographic, obstetrical, and medical information was abstracted using medical records. The vaccinated and unvaccinated groups were evaluated using chi-square tests and a Bayesian model. Results: Among the 157 participants, 38.2% are vaccinated. There were no significant differences in race/ethnicity, living situation, marital status, employment status, insurance type, pregravid body mass index, history of recreational drug use, number of living children, or gestational age at the time of survey. Patients with less formal education are less likely to be vaccinated. There was no difference between influenza and tetanus diphtheria pertussis vaccination rates with COVID-19 vaccination rates. Unvaccinated patients cite lack of data in pregnancy (66%) as their primary concern. Most patients prefer to learn about vaccines via conversation with their doctor (46.7% for vaccinated and 59.8% for unvaccinated). Conclusions: The vaccination rate is low in our population. A provider-initiated conversation about COVID-19 vaccination included with routine prenatal care could increase the vaccination rate.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/whr.2022.0006en_US
dc.format.extent9 pagesen_US
dc.genrejournal articlesen_US
dc.identifierdoi:10.13016/m24fy7-9hez
dc.identifier.citationMarcia DesJardin, Edward Raff, Nicholas Baranco, and Dimitrios Mastrogiannis. "Cross-Sectional Survey of High-Risk Pregnant Women's Opinions on COVID-19 Vaccination." Women's Health Reports.Jul 2022.608-616.http://doi.org/10.1089/whr.2022.0006en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1089/whr.2022.0006
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11603/25195
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherMary Ann Lieberten_US
dc.relation.isAvailableAtThe University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC)
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Computer Science and Electrical Engineering Department Collection
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Faculty Collection
dc.rightsThis item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.en_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleCross-Sectional Survey of High-Risk Pregnant Women's Opinions on COVID-19 Vaccinationen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dcterms.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9900-1972en_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
whr.2022.0006.pdf
Size:
865.17 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.56 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: