A Comparison of Behavior and Achievement of PRIDE Students with Emotional Disturbance in General and Special Education Classroom Settings
Loading...
Links to Files
Permanent Link
Collections
Author/Creator
Author/Creator ORCID
Date
2020-05-02
Type of Work
Department
Education
Program
Masters of Education
Citation of Original Publication
Rights
This work may be protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. To obtain information or permission to publish or reproduce, please contact the Goucher Special Collections & Archives at 410-337-6347 or email archives@goucher.edu.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare PRIDE students’ behavior and achievement in their
general and special education classroom settings Participants were 10 students who had failed to
meet the promotion requirements to move to the next grade level last year and were in a
specialized program for emotionally disturbed (ED) students called P.R.I.D.E., which stands for
the behavioral goals taught in the program: Positive, Respectful/Responsible, In Control,
Dedicated and Empathetic . The purpose of PRIDE is to provide students with supports to help
them successfully transition to general education classrooms. The researcher collected students’
daily behavior ratings from their point sheets, daily grades and anecdotal notes in both their
special (PRIDE) and general education classes. Participants’ grades and PRIDE points earned in
both settings were compared to help the researcher consider which behaviors were exhibited and
how to improve behavior and academic performance in both settings. The t statistic comparing
the PRIDE points in the two settings (3.19) was found to be statistically significant, (p<.002), so
hypothesis 1 was rejected. The t statistic comparing mean daily grades in the Pride and Inclusion
room of 2.784 (mean difference was 6.114 percentage points) was statistically significant (p<
.006), so hypothesis 2 was also rejected. These findings indicated behavior and grades were rated
higher in the PRIDE setting overall. The correlation between grades and behavior ratings in the
inclusion room were statistically significant, so hypothesis 3 was rejected, but that was not the
case in the PRIDE room, so hypothesis 4 was retained. However, the correlation between grades
and points in the PRIDE room was also positive, so both correlations indicated that students who
demonstrated better behavior (compared to the other participants) also tended to demonstrate
better performance on academic tasks.