Estimating surface NO₂ and SO₂ mixing ratios from fast-response total column observations and potential application to geostationary missions
Links to Files
Author/Creator
Author/Creator ORCID
Date
Type of Work
Department
Program
Citation of Original Publication
Knepp, T., Pippin, M., Crawford, J. et al. Estimating surface NO₂ and SO₂ mixing ratios from fast-response total column observations and potential application to geostationary missions. J Atmos Chem 72, 261–286 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-013-9257-6
Rights
This work was written as part of one of the author's official duties as an Employee of the United States Government and is therefore a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 105, no copyright protection is available for such works under U.S. Law.
Public Domain Mark 1.0
Public Domain Mark 1.0
Subjects
Abstract
Total-column nitrogen dioxide (NO₂) data collected by a ground-based sun-tracking spectrometer system (Pandora) and an photolytic-converter-based in-situ instrument collocated at NASA’s Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia were analyzed to study the relationship between total-column and surface NO₂ measurements. The measurements span more than a year and cover all seasons. Surface mixing ratios are estimated via application of a planetary boundary-layer (PBL) height correction factor. This PBL correction factor effectively corrects for boundary-layer variability throughout the day, and accounts for up to ≈75 % of the variability between the NO₂ data sets. Previous studies have made monthly and seasonal comparisons of column/surface data, which has shown generally good agreement over these long average times. In the current analysis comparisons of column densities averaged over 90 s and 1 h are made. Applicability of this technique to sulfur dioxide (SO₂) is briefly explored. The SO₂ correlation is improved by excluding conditions where surface levels are considered background. The analysis is extended to data from the July 2011 DISCOVER-AQ mission over the greater Baltimore, MD area to examine the method’s performance in more-polluted urban conditions where NO₂ concentrations are typically much higher.