Comparison of Raindrop Size Distribution between NASA’s S-Band Polarimetric Radar and Two-Dimensional Video Disdrometers

dc.contributor.authorTokay, Ali
dc.contributor.authorD’Adderio, Leo Pio
dc.contributor.authorMarks, David A.
dc.contributor.authorPippitt, Jason L.
dc.contributor.authorWolff, David B.
dc.contributor.authorPetersen, Walter A.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-10T18:30:18Z
dc.date.available2020-06-10T18:30:18Z
dc.date.issued2020-03-17
dc.description.abstractThe ground-based-radar-derived raindrop size distribution (DSD) parameters—mass-weighted drop diameter Dmass and normalized intercept parameter NW—are the sole resource for direct validation of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission Core Observatory satellite-based retrieved DSD. Both Dmass and NW are obtained from radar-measured reflectivity ZH and differential reflectivity ZDR through empirical relationships. This study uses existing relationships that were determined for the GPM ground validation (GV) program and directly compares the NASA S-band polarimetric radar (NPOL) observables of ZH and ZDR and derived Dmass and NW with those calculated by two-dimensional video disdrometer (2DVD). The joint NPOL and 2DVD datasets were acquired during three GPM GV field campaigns conducted in eastern Iowa, southern Appalachia, and western Washington State. The comparative study quantifies the level of agreement for ZH, ZDR, Dmass, and log(NW) at an optimum distance (15–40 km) from the radar as well as at distances greater than 60 km from radar and over mountainous terrain. Interestingly, roughly 10%–15% of the NPOL ZH–ZDR pairs were well outside the envelope of 2DVD-estimated ZH–ZDR pairs. The exclusion of these pairs improved the comparisons noticeably.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipDiscussions with Robert Meneghini of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center were very helpful. Special thanks are given to the 2DVD and NPOL engineers, technicians, and scientists who participated in GPM field campaigns. This paper was funded under NASA Precipitation Measuring Mission NNX16AD45G led by Ramesh Kakar and, subsequently, Gail Skofronick-Jackson of NASA Headquarters. Authors Petersen and Wolff acknowledge support from the NASA component of GPM and the NASA PMM Programs.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/full/10.1175/JAMC-D-18-0339.1en_US
dc.format.extent17 pagesen_US
dc.genrejournal articlesen_US
dc.identifierdoi:10.13016/m2emfb-pxwj
dc.identifier.citationTokay, A., L. P. D’Adderio, D. A. Marks, J. L. Pippitt, D. B. Wolff, and W. A. Petersen, 2020: Comparison of Raindrop Size Distribution between NASA’s S-Band Polarimetric Radar and Two-Dimensional Video Disdrometers. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 59, 517–533, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-18-0339.1.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-18-0339.1
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11603/18862
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Meteorological Society (AMS)en_US
dc.relation.isAvailableAtThe University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC)
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Joint Center for Earth Systems Technology
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Faculty Collection
dc.rightsThis item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.
dc.rightsAccess to this item will begin on 3/17/21
dc.titleComparison of Raindrop Size Distribution between NASA’s S-Band Polarimetric Radar and Two-Dimensional Video Disdrometersen_US
dc.typeTexten_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
jamcd180339.pdf
Size:
2.77 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.56 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: