A Systematic Review of Mands for Information

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorCengher, Mirela
dc.contributor.authorBowman, Matthew D.
dc.contributor.authorShawler, Lesley A.
dc.contributor.authorCeribo, Meghan
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-15T16:05:42Z
dc.date.available2022-07-15T16:05:42Z
dc.date.issued2022-06-05
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this paper was to conduct a systematic review of studies on mands for information. We used a combination of keywords to search for articles through PsycINFO® and then conducted reference and citation searches for all articles that met our inclusion criteria. In total, we identified 32 studies with 35 experiments. The most commonly investigated autoclitic frames were where and who, and the least investigated were why and how. Over half of the studies included an evocative scenario that served as a test condition, but did not include a control condition; however, there was an overall increasing trend toward including both conditions starting in 2007. The authors of the published studies reported that participants received information, which led to other reinforcers. We make recommendations for clinical practice, as well as discuss directions for future research.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/bin.1893en_US
dc.format.extent49 pagesen_US
dc.genrejournal articlesen_US
dc.genrepostprintsen_US
dc.identifierdoi:10.13016/m2u24a-ynv2
dc.identifier.citationCengher, M., Bowman, M. D., Shawler, L. A., & Ceribo-Singh, M. S. M. (2022). A systematic review of mands for information. Behavioral Interventions, 1– 23. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1893en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1893
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11603/25179
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.isAvailableAtThe University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC)
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Psychology Department Collection
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Faculty Collection
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Student Collection
dc.rightsThis is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Cengher, M., Bowman, M. D., Shawler, L. A., & Ceribo-Singh, M. S. M. (2022). A systematic review of mands for information. Behavioral Interventions, 1– 23. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1893, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1893. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. This article may not be enhanced, enriched or otherwise transformed into a derivative work, without express permission from Wiley or by statutory rights under applicable legislation. Copyright notices must not be removed, obscured or modified. The article must be linked to Wiley’s version of record on Wiley Online Library and any embedding, framing or otherwise making available the article or pages thereof by third parties from platforms, services and websites other than Wiley Online Library must be prohibited.en_US
dc.rightsAccess to this item will begin on date 6/5/24
dc.titleA Systematic Review of Mands for Informationen_US
dc.title.alternativeMotivating operations and mands for information: a systematic review
dc.typeTexten_US
dcterms.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6638-5212en_US
dcterms.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0535-1526en_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
A Systematic Review of Mands for Information FINAL (1).pdf
Size:
648.83 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.56 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

UMBC Psychology Department
UMBC Faculty Collection
UMBC Student Collection