Places of Pride: Recognizing Gayborhoods as Traditional Cultural Places
Loading...
Links to Files
Permanent Link
Collections
Author/Creator
Author/Creator ORCID
Date
2025-05
Department
Program
MA in Historic Preservation
Citation of Original Publication
Rights
This work may be protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. To obtain information or permission to publish or reproduce, please contact the Goucher Special Collections & Archives at 410-337-6347 or email archives@goucher.edu.
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Subjects
Abstract
In recent years, there has been a trend in historic preservation to identify and preserve
the heritage of underrepresented communities including those under the LGBTQ+ umbrella.
The focus of these efforts has centered around preserving the history of these communities
through landmarking of individual buildings, creating public art installations, establishing
grassroots memory projects, and activities such as walking tours. While valuable, these efforts
fail to capture the living cultural heritage of the various LGBTQ+ communities. Using the historic
preservation concept of Traditional Cultural Properties (TCPs) established by Thomas F. King
and Patrica L. Parker in the National Register Bulletin 38 and research into sense of place theory
discussed by Edward Relph in A Pragmatic Sense of Place, this thesis argues that culturally
significant LGBTQ+ places should be regarded as TCPs. Additionally, this treatise explores the
concepts of secular ritual and civil religion making the argument that culturally significant
LGBTQ+ places serve the same purpose and function as did ethnic enclaves for America’s
immigrant and minority communities. These communities are already recognized as TCPs
within current preservation practice. Through case studies of San Francisco’s Castro District,
Washington, DC’s Dupont Circle, and the Massachusetts community of Provincetown the
treatise demonstrates how culturally significant LGBTQ+ places meet the criteria to be regarded
as TCPs. Potential challenges to the successful listing of LGBTQ+ TCPs in the National Register
are explored with recommendations to overcome some of the barriers presented. This thesis
demonstrates that there needs to be a paradigm change within the preservation field; now is
time that the places to which the various LGBTQ+ communities ascribe cultural value are
recognized for what they are: TCPs.