Cross Validation of Two Partitioning-Based Sampling Approaches in Mesocosms Containing PCB Contaminated Field Sediment, Biota, and Activated Carbon Amendment

dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, Stine N.
dc.contributor.authorWang, Alice P.
dc.contributor.authorGidley, Philip T.
dc.contributor.authorWooley, Allyson H.
dc.contributor.authorLotufo, Guilherme R.
dc.contributor.authorBurgess, Robert M.
dc.contributor.authorGhosh, Upal
dc.contributor.authorFernandez, Loretta A.
dc.contributor.authorMayer, Philipp
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-09T17:54:31Z
dc.date.issued2017-09-05
dc.description.abstractThe Gold Standard for determining freely dissolved concentrations (C*ᵣₑₑ) of hydrophobic organic compounds in sediment interstitial water would be in situ deployment combined with equilibrium sampling, which is generally difficult to achieve. In the present study, ex situ equilibrium sampling with multiple thicknesses of silicone and in situ pre-equilibrium sampling with low density polyethylene (LDPE) loaded with performance reference compounds were applied independently to measure polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in mesocosms with (1) New Bedford Harbor sediment (MA, U.S.A.), (2) sediment and biota, and (3) activated carbon amended sediment and biota. The aim was to cross validate the two different sampling approaches. Around 100 PCB congeners were quantified in the two sampling polymers, and the results confirmed the good precision of both methods and were in overall good agreement with recently published LDPE to silicone partition ratios. Further, the methods yielded C*ᵣₑₑ in good agreement for all three experiments. The average ratio between C*ᵣₑₑ determined by the two methods was factor 1.4 ± 0.3 (range: 0.6–2.0), and the results thus cross-validated the two sampling approaches. For future investigations, specific aims and requirements in terms of application, data treatment, and data quality requirements should dictate the selection of the most appropriate partitioning-based sampling approach. * = subscript f
dc.description.sponsorshipWe also acknowledge Paul Schroeder for prereviewing this paper and the Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program for funding (US-SERDP, 14 ER03-035/ER-2431).
dc.description.urihttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acs.est.7b01909
dc.format.extent9 pages
dc.genrejournal articles
dc.identifierdoi:10.13016/m2j4lp-tpvz
dc.identifier.citationSchmidt, Stine N., Alice P. Wang, Philip T. Gidley, Allyson H. Wooley, Guilherme R. Lotufo, Robert M. Burgess, Upal Ghosh, Loretta A. Fernandez, and Philipp Mayer. “Cross Validation of Two Partitioning-Based Sampling Approaches in Mesocosms Containing PCB Contaminated Field Sediment, Biota, and Activated Carbon Amendment.” Environmental Science & Technology 51, no. 17 (September 5, 2017): 9996–10004. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01909.
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01909
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11603/39164
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherACS
dc.relation.isAvailableAtThe University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC)
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Faculty Collection
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Chemical, Biochemical & Environmental Engineering Department
dc.rightsThis work was written as part of one of the author's official duties as an Employee of the United States Government and is therefore a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 105, no copyright protection is available for such works under U.S. Law.
dc.rightsPublic Domain
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/
dc.subjectGeological materials
dc.subjectComputer simulations
dc.subjectPhenyls
dc.subjectPolymers
dc.subjectEquilibrium
dc.titleCross Validation of Two Partitioning-Based Sampling Approaches in Mesocosms Containing PCB Contaminated Field Sediment, Biota, and Activated Carbon Amendment
dc.typeText

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
schmidtetal2017crossvalidationoftwopartitioningbasedsamplingapproachesinmesocosmscontainingpcb.pdf
Size:
1.58 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
es7b01909_si_001.pdf
Size:
425.75 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format