Be Brief, Be Consistent, Be Neutral: Comments on US Draft Circular A-4, “Regulatory Analysis”

Author/Creator

Author/Creator ORCID

Department

Program

Citation of Original Publication

Farrow, Scott. “Be Brief, Be Consistent, Be Neutral: Comments on US Draft Circular A-4, ‘Regulatory Analysis.’” Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, June 13, 2025, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/bca.2025.12.

Rights

Attribution 4.0 International

Subjects

Abstract

Ex ante, my primary concerns were about implementation across the wide expanse of federal applications, supporting the supplemental use of distributional weighting, trying to find a supportable middle ground on discounting using the expected value of bounds and a more consistent scope of analysis. Ex post, I felt heard if not followed, perhaps not uncommon for reviewers.