Be Brief, Be Consistent, Be Neutral: Comments on US Draft Circular A-4, “Regulatory Analysis”
Author/Creator
Author/Creator ORCID
Date
Type of Work
Department
Program
Citation of Original Publication
Farrow, Scott. “Be Brief, Be Consistent, Be Neutral: Comments on US Draft Circular A-4, ‘Regulatory Analysis.’” Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, June 13, 2025, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/bca.2025.12.
Rights
Attribution 4.0 International
Subjects
Abstract
Ex ante, my primary concerns were about implementation across the wide expanse of federal applications, supporting the supplemental use of distributional weighting, trying to find a supportable middle ground on discounting using the expected value of bounds and a more consistent scope of analysis. Ex post, I felt heard if not followed, perhaps not uncommon for reviewers.
