Symbol Digit Modalities Test incidental learning: Concurrent validity and clinical utility

dc.contributor.authorEscarfulleri, Shaline
dc.contributor.authorSpiegel, Alicia J.
dc.contributor.authorMalik, Hinza
dc.contributor.authorFaulkner, Lauren
dc.contributor.authorGradwohl, Brian D.
dc.contributor.authorTolle, Kathryn A.
dc.contributor.authorWendell, Carrington Rice
dc.contributor.authorShaked, Danielle
dc.contributor.authorWaldstein, Shari R.
dc.contributor.authorKatzel, Leslie I.
dc.contributor.authorSeliger, Stephen L.
dc.contributor.authorSpencer, Robert Joseph
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-03T19:33:58Z
dc.date.issued2025-05-26
dc.description.abstractThis project examined the Incidental Learning (IL) procedure from the Symbol-Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) as both a screening tool and as a measure of memory. Participants included undergraduate college students and stroke- and dementia-free older adult volunteers with and without hypertension or chronic kidney disease. In each sample, IL scores were correlated with performances from a variety of cognitive tasks. Results indicated that IL scores were more strongly associated with tests of memory than other cognitive abilities. As a screening instrument for older adults, scores of four or more recalled symbol-digit pairings strongly indicated a lack of difficulties on other tests of memory, whereas scores of three or fewer suggested a need for further assessment, though not necessarily impairment. A novel recognition (IL-r) procedure was introduced to older participants without kidney disease, and results indicated that IL-r uniquely predicted both delayed verbal and visual memory beyond standard IL. Our findings suggest that IL can be regarded as an efficient supplemental or screening test of memory that offers a complementary methodology to a comprehensive assessment of memory.
dc.description.urihttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23279095.2025.2509088#abstract
dc.format.extent8 pages
dc.genrejournal articles
dc.identifierdoi:10.13016/m2pdze-nfht
dc.identifier.citationEscarfulleri, Shaline, Alicia J. Spiegel, Hinza B. Malik, et al. “Symbol Digit Modalities Test Incidental Learning: Concurrent Validity and Clinical Utility.” Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, Routledge, May 26, 2025, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2509088.
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2509088
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11603/40379
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis
dc.relation.isAvailableAtThe University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC)
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Student Collection
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Meyerhoff Scholars Program
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Psychology Department
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Faculty Collection
dc.rightsThis work was written as part of one of the author's official duties as an Employee of the United States Government and is therefore a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 105, no copyright protection is available for such works under U.S. Law.
dc.rightsPublic Domain
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/
dc.subjectmemory
dc.subjectneuropsychological assessment
dc.subjectIncidental learning
dc.subjectpsychometrics
dc.titleSymbol Digit Modalities Test incidental learning: Concurrent validity and clinical utility
dc.typeText
dcterms.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5088-1561
dcterms.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8071-7698

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Symbol.pdf
Size:
866.69 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format